F-35 B
The F-35B Lightning II
was supposed to be a game-changer for Britain’s Royal Navy. As the short
take-off and vertical landing (STOVL) version of the world’s most advanced
fighter, it was designed to operate seamlessly from the Queen Elizabeth-class
carriers. Sleek, stealthy, and full of cutting-edge sensors, it promised to
give the UK a technological edge for decades.
But the reality has been far more complicated. Years after joining the fleet, the F-35B is drawing criticism for being expensive, unreliable, and plagued by delays. From readiness problems to high-profile mishaps—including a fighter stranded in India for over a month—the aircraft is increasingly viewed as both an asset and a liability. The big question now: is the Royal Navy losing faith in its most ambitious fighter project?
Readiness Woes: The Mission Gap
When the UK committed to the
F-35 program, the expectation was that these jets would deliver unmatched
combat readiness. Instead, a National Audit Office (NAO) report in 2025
revealed that Britain’s fleet could only carry out around one-third of
required missions.
Why so low? Several reasons
stack up:
- A shortage of trained engineers and
pilots, slowing operations.
- A lack of spare parts, meaning
damaged or worn jets sit grounded.
- Accelerated corrosion
from harsh maritime conditions.
In plain terms, many F-35Bs
are not flying when needed. While the jet is formidable on paper, its
operational availability in the UK is well below expectations, raising
concerns about whether the Royal Navy’s carrier strike groups could operate at
full strength in a crisis.
Delays in Weapons and Upgrades
Beyond readiness, another
frustration is the delay in weapons integration and technology upgrades. Two
key missiles—the Meteor air-to-air missile and the SPEAR 3 precision
strike weapon—were meant to give the F-35B a lethal edge. Yet, both systems
are now delayed until the early 2030s.
The much-hyped Block IV
upgrade, which would expand computing power, sensor range, and electronic
warfare capabilities, has also been repeatedly pushed back. Without these
enhancements, the aircraft risks being outpaced by rival fighters like China’s
J-20 or even modernized fourth-generation jets.
For the Royal Navy, this means flying a fighter that is technically advanced—but not yet living up to the full promise that justified its steep costs.
Spiraling Costs
Perhaps the most controversial
issue is money. When the UK joined the program, the projected lifetime cost for
its F-35Bs was £18.76 billion. Today, that estimate has skyrocketed to £71
billion.
With £11 billion already
spent, taxpayers and defense experts alike are asking whether Britain is
getting its money’s worth. Every pound poured into the F-35 program is a pound
not spent on other critical needs—whether it’s frigates, drones, or pilot
training.
Global Mishaps: Embarrassments Abroad
The F-35’s problems aren’t
confined to spreadsheets. Several headline-grabbing incidents have drawn
attention to the jet’s reliability.
Stranded in Kerala, India
On 14 June 2025, a
Royal Navy F-35B was forced to divert and land at Thiruvananthapuram
International Airport in Kerala during bad weather. What seemed like a
minor diversion turned into a diplomatic and operational headache.
The jet developed hydraulic
and auxiliary power unit (APU) issues and was grounded. For nearly five
weeks, it sat in India—a country not cleared to host or service F-35s—under
heavy guard. Social media erupted with memes, and Indian newspapers highlighted
the unusual sight of one of the world’s most advanced stealth fighters sitting
idle at a civilian airport.
It finally departed on 22
July 2025, but not before raising serious questions about the jet’s
resilience and the risk of exposing sensitive technology abroad.
Frozen Failure in Alaska
Earlier, in January 2025,
a U.S. Air Force F-35A crashed at Eielson Air Force Base in Alaska. The
cause? Frozen hydraulic fluid. Despite a 50-minute troubleshooting call
with ground engineers, the pilot couldn’t regain control and had to eject.
This incident underscored how
even advanced fighters are vulnerable to extreme weather—and how a seemingly
small technical flaw can bring down a multi-million-dollar jet.
Crash in California
Just weeks after the Kerala
stranding, another F-35 made headlines. This time, a U.S. Navy F-35 crashed
near Naval Air Station Lemoore in California. Thankfully, the pilot ejected
safely, but the crash reignited concerns about the fleet’s reliability.
These back-to-back
incidents—across different environments and operators—paint a worrying picture
of a fighter that, despite its advanced design, still struggles with basic
dependability.
The Bright Spots: Allied Cooperation
Despite frustrations, the
F-35B remains central to Britain’s defense strategy. It is the only aircraft
designed to fly from the Royal Navy’s Queen Elizabeth-class carriers,
and it plays a vital role in maintaining interoperability with allies.
In summer 2025, the HMS
Prince of Wales hosted U.S. Marine Corps F-35Bs during its
Indo-Pacific deployment. The carrier also trained alongside Japan’s JS Kaga,
marking a milestone in UK-Japanese naval cooperation. These operations showed
that, while the F-35 may be troublesome, it is also a powerful tool for strengthening
alliances.
For Britain, this
interoperability is a major selling point. In a world of rising
tensions—whether in Europe or the Pacific—being able to operate seamlessly with
American and Japanese forces gives the Royal Navy a crucial edge.
Between Hope and Frustration
The debate over the F-35B
often splits opinion.
- Supporters
argue that the jet’s stealth, sensor fusion, and advanced avionics make it
unmatched in modern combat. No other aircraft in the UK’s arsenal comes
close to what the Lightning II can offer.
- Critics counter that the
aircraft is unreliable, far too expensive, and a classic case of
over-promising and under-delivering.
For the Royal Navy, the
dilemma is stark. Billions are already invested, and the carriers were built
specifically to operate this aircraft. Walking away isn’t an option. But
doubling down without addressing the jet’s problems is equally risky.
Conclusion: Can the F-35 Redeem Itself?
The Royal Navy’s faith in
the F-35B has been shaken—but not broken. The jet remains at the heart of
Britain’s naval strategy, yet every delay, crash, and cost overrun chips away
at its credibility.
The next few years will be
crucial. If weapons integration, Block IV upgrades, and reliability
improvements finally materialize, the F-35B could still fulfill its promise as
the world’s most advanced stealth fighter. If not, it risks becoming a
cautionary tale of technology that dazzled on paper but stumbled in practice.
For now, the UK continues to
bet big on the Lightning II—hoping that the aircraft will eventually justify
its cost, silence its critics, and prove itself worthy of the carriers it was
built to serve.
Frequently Asked Questions
How many F-35Bs does the Royal
Navy currently have? The UK has received 27 F-35Bs as of early
2025, out of a currently planned total of 48 aircraft.
How much does each F-35B cost? Each
F-35B costs approximately £90-100 million ($115-130 million) to purchase, with
operating costs around £36,000 ($47,000) per flight hour.
Why did the UK choose the
F-35B variant? The UK selected the F-35B because it's the
only variant capable of short takeoff and vertical landing, making it
compatible with the Royal Navy's carriers which don't have catapults.
Are there alternatives to the
F-35B for the Royal Navy? Currently, no other modern fighter jet
offers the STOVL capability needed for the Queen Elizabeth-class carriers. The
Royal Navy is exploring unmanned systems as complementary capabilities.
How many F-35Bs can fit on a
Queen Elizabeth-class carrier? While the carriers were
designed to accommodate up to 36 F-35Bs each, budget constraints mean actual
deployments have featured far fewer aircraft.
What is the combat range of
the F-35B? The F-35B has a combat radius of approximately 450
nautical miles, which is less than other F-35 variants.
Does the Royal Navy operate
F-35Bs alone or with allies? The Royal Navy has relied on
US Marine Corps F-35Bs to supplement its own aircraft during carrier
deployments to achieve operational numbers.
0 Comments